How do I get My Grade? Presentation Rubric |
||||
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Organization |
Excellent organization; Format was logical and easy to follow; Excellent connections between ideas; the organization definitely increased the overall effect of the presentation |
Good organization was apparent; transitions were present and easy to follow, but there were some problems understanding the ideas |
Fair organization; ideas were not presented in a clear manner and transitions were at times rough, which at times made the audience shake their heads with confusion |
Confusing; little or no format; difficult to follow; poor or no transitions of ideas; audience is unable to follow presentation |
Research |
Research greatly exceeded expectations; used material from other websites in addition to those provided; brought in additional information to support recommendations |
Did a very good job of researching; used provided website information to their maximum; included several relevant statistics, examples and expert opinions to support recommendations |
Used provided website information in a satisfactory manner, but included very few relevant statistics, examples or expert opinions to support their recommendations |
Did an unsatisfactory job using provided website information; poor fact gathering on the topic to support recommendations |
Creativity |
Approach was extremely original and clever; kept audience interest for the entire length of the presentation |
Some originality; well conceived and organized presentation; audience showed interest most of the time |
Moments of originality interspersed in a rather routine type presentation; audience showed interest a few times |
Bland, dull presentation; presentation lacked any creative moments; Oh hum presentation; audience basically slept |
Subject Knowledge |
Group demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all questions with explanations and convincingly defends their recommendations |
Group is at ease with expected answers to all questions, and is able to defend their group recommendations |
Group is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only the most basic questions and can only barely defend their recommendations |
Group does not have grasp of information; Cannot answer questions about subject or defend the recommendations |
Visual Aids/ Technology |
Excellent variety of visual aids and technology; visual aids were interesting and clear and enhanced the content |
Some use of good, clear, colorful and content enhancing visual aids and one use of technology |
Very limited variety of visual aids; visual aids not clear and distracted from content; one use of technology |
No use of visual aids or technology |
Sustainability |
Fully gets sustainability and global questions; Understands implications and effects of sustainability to this case; shows value and limitations of the sustainability concept; mentions a number of sustainability elements |
Reasonably good understanding of sustainability and its implications for the case; shows the value and limitations of the sustainability concept, some understanding and mention of sustainability elements |
Moderate understanding of sustainability, its implications and relevance to the case; mentions a few elements of sustainability. |
Shows little knowledge of sustainability and its relevance to the case; shows no understanding of the elements of sustainability; for what the student has shown, the case is not even about sustainability |