Guiding Questions Rubric for Mercury
TIES Rubrics
Examining the Quality
of Thinking
This module is designed to help you develop skill in
examining a contaminant in a specific environment, Ramford County. We believe
that if you are immersed in the problems and data of this specific situation,
you will be well equipped to examine the effect of this, or any, contaminant in
other situations. Therefore, we expect that your report will be specifically
related to the Ramford County situation and use those data presented in the
module. Your team reports should be organized by the issues identified in the
rubric.
The problem requires analysis of data about the contaminant
in the environment in terms of:
1.
Causes/sources
2. Extent
of the problem
3.
Exposure to humans and the environment
4.
Strategies for cleanup and/or remediation and related to extent of the
problem
All teams consider these core issues and then each team takes
a unique perspective of the problem to examine in depth:
Team |
Specific areas of investigation |
Field |
Environmental concentrations, interaction with
environment (including how conditions affect contaminant, persistence and
movement) |
Laboratory |
Threat to humans and wildlife, routes and levels of
exposure |
Community/Risk | Risk of exposure to communities and how to communicate them and educate the public. |
Economic/Policy |
Cost (and cost effectiveness) of mitigation,
responsibility for contamination and cleanup, potential economic
impact |
Solutions/ |
Cleanup and remediation technologies, further exposure
|
Specialists |
Meteorologist, GIS specialist, ethicist,
epidemiologist, virologist, etc. |
The rubric is a guide to quality thinking. It describes a
continuum of progress toward an exemplary response (4). It presupposes that
language use and mechanics do not interfere with meaning. It is cumulative in
the sense that a Level 2 response both describes the situation and states
conclusions; a Level 4 response makes recommendations that are based on
scientific explanations for the conclusions drawn about the situation. Enough
data and sources are given in the module to support a Level 4 response. In
general, the levels represent a continuum of understanding, moving from
definition to application of the knowledge:
1.
Describes the situation created by the contaminant
2. States
conclusions with evidence and citations* to support those conclusions
3. Gives
an explanation for the situation using logic, historical data, chemical analyses
and data representations such as, graphs and charts to analyze and synthesize
data to support a scientific explanation.
4. Tells
the significance of the effects and issues on the air, land, water and living
things. Applies what is known about this specific situation to make
recommendations and support them with data from Ramford County and analogous
situations.
Citation = documentation of a source of information being used as evidence to support a conclusion or explanation, including author, publication, and context. Author and date should appear with the information in the text, and a full citation in a list of references at the end (APA style): http://www.ramapo.edu/content/campus.resources/potter/
For guidelines on plagiarism:
http:// www.indiana.edu/~wts/wts/plagiarism.html
All Teams are responsible for the first three questions:
Issues |
1 Describe |
2
Conclude |
3 Explain |
4 |
Definition | Dictionary Definition | Definition in context with examples of use | Scientific Explanation | Discriminate between definitions and/or viewpoints |
Concentration | Known concentrations of mercury throughout Ramford; Reasons for relative concentrations in Ramford | Sources of mercury (point, non-point) nationally and internationally | Changes in concentration over time and reasons for the changes | Assessment of the total extent of contaminant in Ramford; cite case studies |
Policy Issues | Timeline of manufacture of the contaminant | Discovery of its effects | Policy of mercury manufacture and use in Ramford and elsewhere | Documentation of case studies and discussion of problem and recommendations |